Previous Entry | Next Entry

Response to the TV Licensing Agency

  • Feb. 20th, 2006 at 4:27 PM
Tryst Side On
RE: Official Warning

Dear Mr. Robinson,

In response to your letter entitled “Official Warning”, reference number 2843790949HM2, I would like to register my distress at your attempts to use scare tactics against myself and fellow tenants. I have not appreciated your chosen tone in previous correspondence and your latest letter has only served to enforce the threatening stance your agency appears to be taking.

Without proof of criminal activity, I feel undeserving of the threats made by yourself and the TV Licensing Agency against myself and my fellow tenants. If you would excuse my bluntness, I find the entire affair to be most uncivil, bordering on rude.

Furthermore, the threats do press on my mind causing me undue stress. This is something that, as an engineering student, I need to avoid. Any distressing distractions have a highly detrimental effect on my research and learning. I hope that you will respect the fact that I have only one opportunity to obtain my degree and as such treat it with a great deal of respect and diligence.

Since leaving home for university, both my fellow tenants and I have felt no need to own or operate a television receiver. Further more we have been extremely careful to ensure that we stay within the law ‘The Communications (Television Licensing) Regulations 2004’ regarding the acquisition and use of any A/V equipment. Considering the lengths to which we have been, I find the continued threats to be most unfair.

Last year, after several attempts, I was able to talk to a member of your call centre staff to inform the TV Licensing Agency of two items. Firstly, the previous tenants to whom previous correspondence had been addressed no longer lived here. As you are undoubtedly aware opening mail to which you are not the named recipient (or authorised to do so by the named recipient) is illegal. Consequentially I was not aware of the intent of these mailings.

The second item which I carefully and clearly informed the call centre operative of was the deliberate non-use or ownership of TV reception equipment at 1 Manor Farm Cottages. This important piece of information appears to have been lost somewhere.

Hence, I would like to take this opportunity to point out that there is no equipment at these premises being used for the purpose of receiving television signals (either wirelessly or by any other means) at the same time or near the same time as other members of the public as part of a broadcast or service.

Therefore, in reference to the above paragraph, my fellow tenants and I have no intention of paying the licence fee or playing host to further threatening behaviour from the TV Licensing Agency.

I hope that this situation can be resolved expediently. To this end, I would like to extend the agency any help it may need. An inspector is welcome to visit by appointment on Wednesday afternoons from two ‘o’ clock onwards, all day Thursday and from one ‘o’ clock onwards on Friday afternoons.

To arrange an appointment, please contact myself in writing at the above address. I look forward to hearing from you soon.


Yours sincerely,





Robert Barnes IEE



In other, happier news, I'm on new drugs and they appear to be working! Yay!

Comments

[info]azron wrote:
Feb. 20th, 2006 04:50 pm (UTC)
2 points - 1, why waste your time like this? let them waste their money sending pointless letters if they want to, and 2, putting IEE after your name in a letter like that just makes you look silly ;)
[info]tryst_fel_cath wrote:
Feb. 20th, 2006 04:55 pm (UTC)
a) I want them to go away. They've been sending pointless letters for a while now and the latest has been more severe suggesting that they actually want to take this somewhere.

b) I want to be recognised as a professional, rather then a 'student bum'. I hate the way that some people will assume that being a student makes me a lazy sap on tax payers money. For an engineering student, that couldn't be further from the truth. I'd rather have a 9-5 then uni every day. But I know that with a degree, I can get payed more after I graduate ^^
[info]azron wrote:
Feb. 20th, 2006 05:14 pm (UTC)
b) yes, but professionals rarely bother putting qualifications after their names in letters unless they're relevant. moreover, if it *was* relevant, you'd probably mention it in your letter ("as a qualified x i know when something blah blah blah"), and so again there's no need to put it after your name, i'd expect you to be taken less seriously, since it's simply 'not the done thing'

also - http://www.cam.ac.uk/cgi-bin/wwwnews?grp=ucam.adverts.forsale&art=48593
[info]tryst_fel_cath wrote:
Feb. 20th, 2006 07:03 pm (UTC)
I don't have any of the envelopes unfortunately... They never sent me any. Shame really as I had to stick a stamp on my reply.
[info]andreuswolf wrote:
Feb. 20th, 2006 05:12 pm (UTC)
Now I see why no-one ever flames you. You pwn them too hard.
[info]d_raven wrote:
Feb. 20th, 2006 06:42 pm (UTC)
you tell those bitches!! They are REALLY threatening as well... o.o

it's on the verge of a threat... you could call the police!
[info]zawolf wrote:
Feb. 20th, 2006 08:15 pm (UTC)
Let us know if you get a non-automated reply :)
[info]mosey_pussycat wrote:
Feb. 20th, 2006 09:26 pm (UTC)
I love the way you force THEM to make the appointment. xxx KUDOS!!!
[info]kurtbatz wrote:
Feb. 20th, 2006 11:52 pm (UTC)
"Now here's to you, Mister Robinson,
Tryst has gone and pwned your candy ass
Woo-woo-woo
What's that you say, Mister Robinson?
The guys you want have moved and gone away
So shut up you gay, shut up you gay o/~"

With apologies to Simon and Garfunkel.
(Anonymous) wrote:
Feb. 24th, 2006 12:14 pm (UTC)
TV licenses
Same situation here. I don't see why I should give my personal details for something I don't own. Currently a case with my MP.

J